Design for Collective Decision Making highlights the often-overlooked role of interface design in shaping democracy itself.
The research examines the design of voting interfaces—who creates them, the principles guiding their development, and the broader political, social, and technological mandates that shape them. It explores how design choices can influence voter behaviors and trust in democratic processes.
This investigation considers not only the aesthetics and usability of voting systems but also the underlying power structures that inform their creation. How much power do designers (in relation to policy makers) have to tilt the political scales– How do different designs impact perceptions of legitimacy–
To probe these questions, Tara develops prototypes for democratic decision-making processes that have not yet been prototyped. She also goes behind the scenes to investigate how, and by whom, existing processes are designed. Her practiced based research critically asks what alternative models might look like in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Background Information
We’re witnessing a fundamental realignment, where politics is less about a political position and more about cultural belonging. The old coalitions are breaking apart, reshaped by demographic shifts, and the fracturing effects of social media. Our current political system is driven by polarization, and asymmetric media ecosystems. The challenge isn’t just that politics is changing, but that it’s changing in ways that erode trust. These aren’t abstract questions; they’re shaping the future of governance. The answer depends on whether we can design systems that encourage engagement over outrage, and problem-solving over performance.